State rules
Pesticide Recordkeeping Rules: TX/FL vs. CA/NY, in Plain Language
Published September 28, 2026
States split into two real groups, not fifty different rulebooks. TX/FL-style states expect you to keep complete application records in any format, no state portal involved. CA and NY go further and require the records to actually be submitted electronically through a state system.
"Recordkeeping requirements vary by state" is true but not that useful if you're trying to figure out what your business actually has to do. The honest split is simpler than fifty separate rulebooks:
| State group | What's required |
|---|---|
| TX / FL-style states | Recordkeeping only. You need complete, accurate application records, but any format is acceptable and there's no state portal you're required to submit through. |
| CA / NY | Genuine mandatory electronic submission. Records have to be filed through a state system, CalAgPermits in California, NYSDEC in New York, not just kept on hand. |
What "recordkeeping only" actually means
In a TX/FL-style state, the obligation is on you to have a complete, retrievable, accurate record for every application, in whatever format you choose to keep it in, spreadsheet, paper logbook, or a purpose-built system. Nobody's collecting it from you automatically. That also means nobody's checking your work for you: if the record is incomplete or hard to find, that's on you when it's requested.
What CA and NY add on top
California and New York don't stop at "keep good records." They require applicators to actually submit application data through a state system: CalAgPermits in California and NYSDEC in New York. California adds a further requirement on top of that: an approved-vendor interface, meaning the software submitting on your behalf has to be recognized by the state, not just any format you put together yourself.
Why this split matters for how you choose a system
If your business operates in a TX/FL-style state, the bar is a complete, well-organized record you can produce on demand. If you operate in CA or NY, or expect to, the bar is higher: the system you use has to actually support submission to the state, not just internal tracking.
For what a complete record needs to contain regardless of state, see what EPA FIFRA recordkeeping requires. For why informal tracking tends to fall apart under either standard, see why paper and spreadsheet records fail.
Where Chemura fits
Chemura is built to the federal and TX/FL recordkeeping baseline first: complete, structured records for every application, kept inside the Jobber account you already use. CA/NY's mandatory electronic-submission requirements are a scoped-out phase two, not yet built.
Read the FAQ